What contrasting description is given for Louis XVI by historian Christopher Hibbert?

The characterization of Louis XVI by historian Christopher Hibbert as brusque and cold highlights the perception of him as a leader who often appeared detached and unapproachable. The term "brusque" suggests a manner that is somewhat abrupt or curt, which may have contributed to his difficulty in connecting with his subjects and understanding their grievances. His perceived coldness indicates a lack of warmth or empathy, which did not resonate well with the people during a time of great distress leading up to the French Revolution. This portrayal underscores the complexities of his reign and how his mannerisms may have impacted the monarchy's relationship with the public, further exacerbating the tensions that led to revolution.

While descriptions such as warm and informal, charismatic and outgoing, or passive and indifferent evoke different aspects of personality, they do not accurately capture the sense of indifference and emotional distance that hibbert emphasizes in his portrayal of Louis XVI.