What did Kerensky mean by saying the Provisional Government had "authority without power"?

Kerensky's assertion that the Provisional Government had "authority without power" highlights the government’s inability to translate its authority into effective action or implementation of decisions. After the February Revolution in 1917, the Provisional Government established itself as a governing body, claiming legitimacy and authority. However, it faced significant challenges, including a lack of control over the military and growing opposition from various factions, particularly the Bolsheviks and more radical elements of the populace.

Despite having the framework of a government and the supposed right to govern, the Provisional Government struggled to enforce its policies or maintain order. This was particularly evident during critical moments, such as its decision to continue fighting in World War I, which was unpopular among the war-weary population and soldiers. Consequently, although it held a position of authority, it lacked the power to effectuate its will or the confidence of the people, leading to discontent and unrest that ultimately contributed to its downfall.

This understanding of the disconnect between authority and power is crucial in analyzing the weaknesses of the Provisional Government in the context of revolutionary dynamics in Russia during this period.